<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Self-Custody vs. Convenience: Where Do You Hold Your BTC?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">With ETFs holding BTC for millions, the debate between easy custodial holding (exchanges, ETFs) and sovereign self-custody (hardware wallets) is critical. "Not your keys, not your coins."</p>
<p dir="auto">The ETF era makes it easier than ever to have exposure to Bitcoin without ever owning the actual asset. This is fine for many, but it contradicts a core Bitcoin principle.</p>
<p dir="auto">Self-custody puts you in full control but comes with the absolute responsibility of securing your seed phrase. The rise of multi-signature wallets and solutions like Unchained Capital or Casa try to bridge this gap.</p>
<p dir="auto">Discussion Starters:</p>
<ul>
<li>
<p dir="auto">What percentage of your stack do you keep in self-custody?</p>
</li>
<li>
<p dir="auto">For beginners, is it reckless to recommend a hardware wallet immediately?</p>
</li>
<li>
<p dir="auto">What's the best "fireproof" method for backing up a seed phrase?</p>
</li>
</ul>
]]></description><link>https://coinsori.com/topic/56/self-custody-vs.-convenience-where-do-you-hold-your-btc</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2026 19:21:32 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://coinsori.com/topic/56.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2026 16:34:28 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>