跳到內容
  • home
  • News
  • How to
  • Coin information
  • Bot Lab
  • General Discussion
  • 最新
  • 熱門
  • 標籤
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • 預設 (未使用主題設計)
  • 未使用主題設計
Collapse

Coinsori

  1. 首頁
  2. News
  3. Ripple's Schwartz Question if Bitcoin Tech Matter

Ripple's Schwartz Question if Bitcoin Tech Matter

已排程 已置頂 已鎖定 已移動 News
1 貼文 1 Posters 1 瀏覽
  • 從舊到新
  • 從新到舊
  • 最多點贊
回覆
  • 在新貼文中回覆
登入後回覆
此主題已被刪除。只有擁有主題管理權限的使用者可以查看。
  • K 離線
    K 離線
    kim
    編寫 最後由 編輯
    #1

    The Bitcoin network’s tech is under renewed scrutiny following a rare "two-block reorg" that saw a single mining entity, Foundry USA, seize control of seven consecutive blocks.

    The event has reignited a debate over the long-term viability of the proof-of-work (PoW) consensus mechanism.

    Ripple CTO David "JoelKatz" Schwartz has weighed in on the matter, arguing that Bitcoin's greatest strength might actually be a centralizing liability.

    Proof-of-work as a "centralizing force"

    Bitcoin proponents often cite PoW as the gold standard for decentralization, but Schwartz offered a contrarian perspective. He has argued that PoW is actually a "centralizing force" that the network is constantly forced to fight against.

    "It really demonstrates a point that I've made several times," Schwartz noted on X. "Bitcoin's decentralization doesn't come from its use of PoW; rather, PoW is a centralizing force Bitcoin has to keep fighting against."

    The tech vs. first-mover debate

    Schwartz was then asked if the market is beginning to "price in" the systemic risks and perceived inefficiencies of the PoW model.

    The Ripple veteran has admitted that these concerns could be exerting "downward pressure" on the price of Bitcoin, but he noted that such a trend is nearly impossible to prove with hard evidence.

    A governance conundrum

    There is also a Catch-22 facing the Bitcoin community regarding mining centralization, according to Schwartz.

    If the community attempts to change the mining algorithm to fix these issues, it proves that "nothing is guaranteed" and that the "mathematical immutability" of the system is subject to human intervention. Conversely, if they leave it as is, it establishes that network security is permanently tied to a centralizing arms race.

    source: https://www.tradingview.com/news/u_today:e43fa155b094b:0-ripple-s-schwartz-question-if-bitcoin-tech-matters/

    1 條回覆 最後回覆
    0

    Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

    Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

    With your input, this post could be even better 💗

    註冊 登入
    回覆
    • 在新貼文中回覆
    登入後回覆
    • 從舊到新
    • 從新到舊
    • 最多點贊


    • 登入

    • 沒有帳戶? 註冊

    • Login or register to search.
    Powered by NodeBB Contributors
    • 第一個貼文
      最後的貼文
    0
    • home
    • News
    • How to
    • Coin information
    • Bot Lab
    • General Discussion
    • 最新
    • 熱門
    • 標籤